As you may have seen in previous posts I have shown an unseen film titled ‘Brides in the Bath‘ starring June Palmer and various other models including Teri Martine. I’ve been able to identify the main models in the film, but there were several unidentified models also appearing in the film and until now they have remained unnamed! Thankfully one of the models, shown in the two roles below has now been identified.
|
|
|
The model playing both of these roles has been identified as Christine Jenson/Jensen by none other than Teri Martine herself! Teri took time last week to look at this site and the video itself and identified Christine. Unfortunately Teri doesn’t remember doing the film herself and in her own words – ‘Now I have something to share with you. I don’t remember doing one scene in the video!!!!!! not one, how could I not remember being in such a fun movie?’. Teri also mentions another model Samantha Seager, but doesn’t directly identify her in the film, but another name to research!
I must thank Teri for taking the time to look at this site and the video’s and identifying Christine and filling another blank for me. It comes as a great honour and pleasure that someone like Teri has taken an interest in the site and enjoyed looking back through it and that it brought back such wonderful memories of the models she used to work with back then!
Teri also took time to look at the Just June site and that it made her very happy to see a site dedicated to her friend June! Great praise indeed and makes it all worth while with what I am doing!
Thanks Teri!
Wonder
Thanks Teri!
Wonder


Please tell Teri that there must be thousands of admirers around the world who love you all girls from the sixties.So sad that June Palmer etc are no longer with us.All the best and may your beauty always shine!
LikeLike
(for your info)I tried sending this via the “Contact Me” page but that doesn't seem to work!I don't know if it's a coincidence but maybe if Teri Martine got the model's first name slightly wrong, I have an obscure reference to a model from the late 1960s with the (almost) same surname and with a first name beginning with “Sa”. There is (after all) a modern actress called “Samantha Seager” (Coronation Street, The Lakes, etc) that could have caused an unintended confusion.I came across the name with regard to some research I was doing some time ago on a UK film called “Witchfinder General” (1968) and although I read your post when it was recent in December I only just re-noticed this reference I had.I typed up a note taken from a reference book called “English Gothic” concerning some uncredited parts in the film – one of which was “Sandy Seagar” (so spelt with an “a” rather than “e”)As you may or may not know there were two versions of some scenes filmed including the inn scene. In one version the inn wenches are clothed and in another they are topless. Each version features a different two girls, but the end credits are unaltered so both versions credit Sally Douglas and Donna Reading whom I suspect are the clothed girls.This “English Gothic” book showed the names of Tasma Bereton and Sandy Seagar as playing uncredited Inn Wenches in the film which I can only surmise means they were playing the topless versions. This is supported because Tasma Bereton was also in “Curse of The Crimson Altar” (1968) in which she was a brunette and seems to look quite like the topless brunette tavern girl from Witchfinder General. So Sandy Seagar is most probably the topless girl with red/golden hair.I don't know if this adds anything or is a coincidental red herring because comparing the girl against the actresses in the Brides In the Bath film I don't see an obvious match, although if any of them were wearing wigs it would be harder to tell.Ref:-ENGLISH GOTHICA century of horror cinemaBy Jonathan Rigbypage 177RegardsAlanTopless Review Site – my blogspot is at: toplessreview.blogspot.co.ukbtw, last November I sent an email to the address listed on your blog profile page 'info@thekameraclub.co.uk' (so I could include some picture attachments) but you never replied so I reckoned you can't have been interested in that contribution (?).
LikeLike
Alan, firstly thanks for all of this info and I will have to digest it and go do some looking myself, but worth looking at. Secondly I try and reply to all mails that come to me directly and I don't remember seeing anything, so apologies on that front. The mail address you quote is correct, so feel free to use that again should you require?
LikeLike