Ann Austin – Going Solo (1958)

[nonmember]

[/nonmember]

[member]

[/member]

A couple of beauties of Ann Austin from Solo No.1 (1958) by Harrison Marks, which contains 32 pages dedicated to Ann and her ample figure and boobs. The top shot (P14) gives us a great view of Ann’s assets, whilst the bottom shot (P27) has her in some black panties and a very tight, waist crushing belt with her arms across her chest trying to hide her ample bosom, and failing!

Two perfect examples of Ann at her best.

Pam & Jean Branching Out (Original)

[nonmember][/nonmember]

[member][/member]

Two stunning beauties in the forms of Pamela Green and Jean Spaul (Sporle) from an original Harrison Marks negative. Taken around 1960, several shots of Pam and Jean along with Mary Deighan posing with tree branches such as this were published in Kamera No.31, with the location looking to be some form of valley or quarry? A real contrast in bodies in this shot as well with Jean’s pale skin in contrast to Pam’s tanned body.

Thanks as always to Simon for sending over this shot from his extensive Pam collection, as it’s always appreciated.

 

Note: This is an original image and subject to this copyright notice

Toni Rees – Bumps & Curves!


A stunningly good shot of Toni Rees from a restored silver gelatin print, showing off every bump and curve of her naked body. What a fabulous curvy body she had and one to be admired for a long time, I know I did! 

Dily Rubens – How to Wear Pyjama’s!


A wonderful shot of a familiar model with an unfamiliar name showing us how good she looks in PJ’s! It is of course Angela Duncan, but these 10 x 8 prints were advertised under the name Dily Rubens, which is a new name to me. I have a few other shots of Angela posing in the short blonde wig, but always thought she went under the name Trudi (Trudy) Pink for those shots? They do all seem to be from the same location, so possibly the same shoot, but not 100% sure?

June Palmer – Just a Little Bit Goofy! (Original)

[nonmember][/nonmember]

[member][/member]

A funny out-take shot of June Palmer on the Roman Bath set, taken by Harrison Marks. Obviously having a goofy moment between shots and decided to pull a funny face for the camera before the next pose. A great alternative shot of June and we still get to see her tits in the shot :)

 

Note: This image is from an original negative and subject to this copyright notice.

June Palmer – Some Added Support (Original)

[nonmember][/nonmember]

[member][/member]

A shot of June from the 1970’s laying on the studio floor nude looking up away from the camera as she cups her tits with her hands for additional support, not that they needed it! A beautiful shot sent over by John.

 

Note: This image is from an original negative and subject to this copyright notice.

Could It Be Danielle?

I love a good mystery normally, but sometimes recognizing the face (and body) of a model, but not remembering her name can be frustrating! This model is one example, as I’ve published one of my own negatives by Harrison Marks here before, but was unable to name her. Now I’ve been sent a full set of the same model posing and stripping with a bamboo ladder, but again it was driving me made as to who she was!

Well by chance today I was looking back through my video’s and noticed this post of ‘Brides in The Bath – Part 2’ and damn me, but there she is in the image and video (2:47) as a can-can girl! Then coincidence number two, I was looking through a copy of Nature’s Intention Vol.1 No.2 and came across these shots of Danielle Denese. Bugger me it seems to be the same model in all of them, so have I identified her as Danielle Denese? My track record of identifying models isn’t bad, but I would say this is one of those 50/50 shots, as the hair, body and facial features match, but I have very few named images of Danielle to actually reference.

I’m going with them all being the same model and it being the model named as ‘Danielle Denese’ by Harrison Marks, because there’s no guarantee that’s her name, or she didn’t model under another name? So one more off the unknown list unless anyone can prove otherwise. :)

Up ↑